Cite activities precisely. See across jurisdictions.
Reference financed activities in guidance and market monitoring with identifiers that stay stable across revisions — and compare how other jurisdictions' taxonomies treat the same activities.
Why regulators and supervisors use ACT-ID
Guidance, consultations, and market monitoring all need to refer to specific financed activities — and those references need to keep working as taxonomies are revised, and be legible to market participants operating under a different jurisdiction's taxonomy entirely. A phrase in a policy document doesn't survive either requirement well; a permanent identifier does.
Jurisdiction-to-jurisdiction comparison
The crosswalks are downloadable comparison tables showing how the same activity is treated across taxonomies — useful when assessing how a proposed rule or threshold compares with peer jurisdictions' existing treatment of the same activity.
Real market documents carrying the IDs
/examples shows real green and sustainability bond frameworks and opinions, tagged with ACT-IDs, so you can see how the identifiers appear in actual market documentation rather than in the abstract.
Open, verifiable data
The full registry is open, CC-BY licensed, and hash-verified — every taxonomy version carries a SHA-256 content hash, and every mapping carries its source document, page, method, and confidence rating. Nothing needs to be taken on trust; it can be checked directly.
A public governance trail
The changelog is a public record of every substantive change to the registry — architecture, schema, and individual identifier decisions — each with a dated rationale. It functions as a governance trail for anyone citing an identifier in official guidance.
The EU–China Common Ground Taxonomy proved the demand for taxonomy interoperability — for one pair of taxonomies. ACT-ID generalises it: every activity, across every tracked framework.
Key benefits for regulators and supervisors
- Stable citations that survive taxonomy revisions
- Direct comparison of activity treatment across jurisdictions
- Evidence from real market documents, not hypotheticals
- Open, hash-verified, source-cited data
- A public, dated governance trail for every registry change
Compare jurisdictions
Browse how activities are treated across taxonomies, or download the open data to run your own analysis.