For Regulators & Supervisors

Cite activities precisely. See across jurisdictions.

Reference financed activities in guidance and market monitoring with identifiers that stay stable across revisions — and compare how other jurisdictions' taxonomies treat the same activities.

Why regulators and supervisors use ACT-ID

Guidance, consultations, and market monitoring all need to refer to specific financed activities — and those references need to keep working as taxonomies are revised, and be legible to market participants operating under a different jurisdiction's taxonomy entirely. A phrase in a policy document doesn't survive either requirement well; a permanent identifier does.

Jurisdiction-to-jurisdiction comparison

The crosswalks are downloadable comparison tables showing how the same activity is treated across taxonomies — useful when assessing how a proposed rule or threshold compares with peer jurisdictions' existing treatment of the same activity.

Real market documents carrying the IDs

/examples shows real green and sustainability bond frameworks and opinions, tagged with ACT-IDs, so you can see how the identifiers appear in actual market documentation rather than in the abstract.

Open, verifiable data

The full registry is open, CC-BY licensed, and hash-verified — every taxonomy version carries a SHA-256 content hash, and every mapping carries its source document, page, method, and confidence rating. Nothing needs to be taken on trust; it can be checked directly.

A public governance trail

The changelog is a public record of every substantive change to the registry — architecture, schema, and individual identifier decisions — each with a dated rationale. It functions as a governance trail for anyone citing an identifier in official guidance.

The EU–China Common Ground Taxonomy proved the demand for taxonomy interoperability — for one pair of taxonomies. ACT-ID generalises it: every activity, across every tracked framework.

Key benefits for regulators and supervisors

  • Stable citations that survive taxonomy revisions
  • Direct comparison of activity treatment across jurisdictions
  • Evidence from real market documents, not hypotheticals
  • Open, hash-verified, source-cited data
  • A public, dated governance trail for every registry change

Compare jurisdictions

Browse how activities are treated across taxonomies, or download the open data to run your own analysis.

Browse taxonomy crosswalks Download the open data